In the traditional model of success for engineers, we’re compelled to find an engineering discipline that we have a blend of aptitude and passion for, and to become specialists in it. However, instead of specialists that have devoted their entire lives to one craft, the engineers that thrive in our current world are generalists that seek something very different: a diverse set of skills and expertise, something called range.
An Engineer That Does X
Most engineers call themselves an “X Engineer” because it describes what they do. However, as aspiring engineers, I believe we should strive not to be an “X Engineer”, but instead, an “Engineer That Does X”. Though both titles share the same meaning, the mindsets are fundamentally different. By focusing first on becoming an engineer, and then picking a discipline, we’re allowed to pursue skills that specialists would often overlook: things like core engineering and professional soft skills.
There’s a popular mantra that states, “you get hired for your hard skills, but keep your job and get promoted for you soft skills.” Most discipline-specific hard-skills can be learned relatively quickly, but fundamental engineering skills, and even more so vocational soft skills, take years to master, but can be applied in innumerably more settings. This is why it is crucial to start working towards mastering these early on.
For a list of important general skills for engineers, reference the links section at the end of this post.
College Should Be a Time To Explore
There are many things you should not rush into, and you career is most certainly one of them. As college students, we’re presented with many opportunities, but I believe the greatest of them all is the opportunity to explore. Just like how you get way too many samples before choosing a flavor at the ice cream parlor, I think this is how we should approach choosing an engineering discipline. Not just comparing the facts and figures, but actually “tasting” (or experiencing) each one. I understand that this can seem incredibly cumbersome and daunting, so I’ve got a dual-faceted response.
First is a question: would you rather spend an extra 4 years pursuing an exciting new career, or 40 years engaging in a lackluster one?
The second is a story. For those of you who aren’t familiar, in the world of men’s tennis, most revere Roger Federer as the Greatest of All Time. However, he was a generalist: Roger played a handful of sports from a young age, and only started focusing solely on tennis many years later. This pattern has also occurred in many other great athletes, such as Steph Curry and Usain Bolt.
By actively exploring, we are more likely to choose a well-fitting career and kick ass at it. Some mediums for exploring engineering disciplines include: sitting in on classes, speaking with those whom practice it, club participation, personal projects, co-op’s and internships, and academic minors. The balance is in diving deep enough to get a personal experience without considerably hindering your ability to resurface and try something else.
Main Takeaways
I believe that to become a effective engineer, you should create a very strong foundation of core engineering and softs kills, go knee-deep into a variety of different engineering disciplines that interest you before committing yourself to just one, and suppress the fear associated with taking a career risk and “having to starting over”, because every step of the way, you’re developing your most quintessential asset—range.
Links
- The Top Soft Skills for Engineers (Glassdoor)
- The book this post was inspired by: Range by David Epstein